After a trial period and several delays, parts of Dordogne in south west France are now subject to a new waste management scheme which aims to encourage people to throw away less.
It allocates households a set quota of visits to collective bins for a fixed sum and then charges more for extra visits.
When SMD3, the firm running the service, announced the rates in November, they were significantly higher than it had estimated earlier in the year.
For a household of two, like mine, the annual subscription has risen from €178 to €244.70, a 37.4% increase.
SMD3 blames the rise on the higher cost of fuel and electricity. Previously, our waste bill was paid as part of our taxe foncière, based on the theoretical rental value of the property.
For a two-bedroom house the rate was around €90 per year.
The new so-called redevance incitative (‘incentive fee’) is designed to halve non-recyclable rubbish by 2025 to meet government guidelines.
I have been issued a card permitting 26 trips a year to a smart new general waste container where, after swiping, I can hoist a maximum of two black bags per go inside while simultaneously pushing down a pedal with my foot to keep the lid open.
Extra visits will set me back €5.22.
Since the new system, I have reduced my general rubbish to virtually nothing.
I am not sure that my total volume of waste has gone down, but it is being redistributed from black to yellow recyclables bags which have free collection.
The success of the scheme relies, of course, on where and how the recyclables are processed.
One associated issue is that restricting bin visits means bags sit at home for up to two weeks.
Heavy, smelly and full of maggots
By then, they are heavy, smelly and full of maggots, particularly in summer.
A single person would have only 16 deposits per year to my 26, and even more maggots.
It is no longer possible to dispose of your rubbish unrecorded.
Not only do we have to pay for a service, but we get rationed, tracked and penalised for overuse.
As we move towards a society in which surveillance becomes the norm, other services will no doubt follow suit, such as electricity consumption and the introduction of a personal digital carbon footprint.
Maybe such initiatives are the only way to curb consumer excess.
Invariably, however, we end up paying more for less, and lose privacy in the process.
Do we need such enforcement of ecological goals? Who is profiting?
The effort would feel more genuine if the consumer was left better off for doing their bit – or at least not out of pocket.
Households that do not use their full quota of bin visits can apply for the surplus to be reallocated to people suffering from incontinence who need more regular visits.
A door-to-door collection service can be arranged for disabled residents at an extra cost.
In these ways, it appears that the scheme penalises some of the most vulnerable people in society, as well as families with young children using nappies.
Locals are fighting back by dumping their bags outside the containers.
Tractors have been engaged in the protest too and one bin near us has been vandalised by disabling the reader or scanner. so more rubbish can be added.