-
French towns take action to reduce percentage of second homes
A new town is to offer ‘tiny homes’ to rent all year round from just €100 per month. Around 25 other French communes are working on similar projects
-
What changes require you to make new property declaration in France?
Tax officials have sent out an email reminding people of the rules
-
How can we cut off utilities at French second home from abroad?
Meter reading need to be taken to close most accounts
Sale of French second home causes capital gains tax worry
We look at the paperwork and bank statements needed to calculate CGT when selling a second home in France
Readers have told us of their worry over a very high capital gains tax (CGT) bill for the sale of a second home.
They said this is because they lack bank statements from 15 years ago proving payments for the purchase of land, their new-build house and their swimming pool.
They said this is despite the fact they will have an overall capital loss.
Bank statements should not be necessary to calculate CGT
The basic taxable capital gain is the difference between the original purchase price recorded in the deeds by the notaire and the sale price, and bank statements should not be necessary for these.
If anything else, - including a house being built on land you bought - is to be considered to reduce the taxable gain, fiscal representatives might ask to see statements. However, some are reportedly more flexible than others on evidence.
One possible ‘solution’ might be providing a large guarantee sum to be held back for three years in case of tax office queries.
See the two articles below on the mandatory hiring of a représentant fiscal to deal with capital gains tax on second home sales.
Couple find solution to French second home tax retention on house sale
Extra step in French property sales for UK, US, Australian residents
Related articles
‘We must help ease 90/180 rule for owners of French second-homes’
Draft list of French communes that could face second-home tax hikes
Estate agents in France defend ‘too high’ commission fees