top cx logo
cx logo
Explorearrow down
search icon

Comment: The Algerian War remains controversial in France 60 years on

The peace treaty was signed on March 18, 1962 but France still feels the impact of the war today

French army veterans hold flags to commemorate the war in Algeria in Laval, western France

Army veterans commemorate the war in Algeria in Laval, western France Pic: gabriel12/shutterstock

Want to start an argument in France? Bring up the topic of the Algerian War, which officially ended in a peace treaty signed 60 years ago this month.

Passions still run high about what the conflict achieved, and these feelings have been inherited by the grandchildren of those involved.

From 1830 to 1954, Algeria was indisputably part of France. It might have been a colony but it was divided into three departments which had equal status to their counterparts across the Mediterranean. 

The problem with colonies is that the longer they last, the more colonists – white European settlers – feel rooted to the territory. To be Algerian in the 1950s could mean two different things. 

While most were culturally Arabic, African and Muslim, a large minority of the population was comprised of Christian and Jewish descendants of earlier colonists who regarded North Africa as their permanent home but who were culturally entirely French.

Explaining what happened next in objective terms is not easy. Some members of the Arabic-Muslim minority expressed their resentment towards French ‘occupation’ and domination through violence. 

Terrorists or freedom fighters

On November 1, 1954, they launched a war of liberation and the French authorities responded with further repression.

In Paris, the rebellion was seen as futile terrorism that could never succeed. It demanded to be put down for the sake of restoring order. 

The French army, including a large contingent of Arabic Algerians, was tasked with defeating the rebels of the FLN (National Liberation Front) by whatever means necessary. Increasingly, that meant resorting to torture.

Successive French governments tried to win the war and take back control but the problem proved beyond the capabilities of the Fourth Republic (established after World War Two). 

Threatened by a military coup, the political system collapsed in impotence. 

General de Gaulle was invited to come out of retirement and form the Fifth Republic. He was allowed to write the constitution he wanted and, in so doing, he gave the president (himself) the powers he insisted were needed to deal with Algeria.

Read more: Could France soon have a Sixth Republic?

De Gaulle was backed by many establishment and military figures who assumed he would successfully reassert French sovereignty in Algeria, echoing the Liberation of 1944 – the only end to the war they could envisage. 

The general, however, had come to see the ‘loss’ of the war and the independence of Algeria as inevitable. It just needed skillful handling.

“Je vous ai compris” (I have heard you), he announced, seemingly to all parties concerned and to no one at the same time.

The general presided over swift negotiations to hand power over to ‘the enemy’, to be confirmed by a referendum. To the losers, it was as if ‘the terrorists’ had won and an integral part of France had been traumatically lost through the betrayal of the hero of right-wing, nationalist politics.

‘Pieds noirs’ felt compelled to leave homeland

There were two long-lasting consequences of the Evian Accords by which Algeria became independent. 

One was that 800,000 European Algerians, known as pieds noirs, felt compelled to leave their ancestral homeland and take refuge in France, where they did not feel they belonged.

The other was that the 200,000 Arabic-Muslim Algerians who had fought alongside the French army, the harkis, felt abandoned. Tens of thousands were killed after the French withdrawal, for which President Macron officially apologised in 2021.

Read more: Four questions to understand the 1961 killing of Algerians in Paris

All this left a poisonous legacy in French politics. At first, there was silence on the issue because it was too raw and divisive, but ‘Algeria’ re-merged in the 1990s and now every contemporary politician needs to be wary of questions about the conflict.

How should the history of French colonialism be taught in schools? With pride, or shame and apologies?

This is the fracture coloniale which is brought into every debate about immigration and the place of Islam in French society.

Whatever you do, don’t mention the war. You won’t get away with it.

 

Do you have strong views about the conflict too? Tell us why at news@connexionfrance.com 

 

Related articles

I read the 5,000-page compendium that tries to explain France

Simon Heffer: Macron has to give Muslims a better future

Did you have your morning 'kawa'? 12 Arabic words and expressions used in French

Resident or second-home owner in France?
Benefit from our daily digest of headlines and how-to's to help you make the most of life in France
By joining the newsletter, you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy
See more popular articles
The Connexion Help Guides
featured helpguide
Healthcare in France*
Featured Help Guide
- Understand the French healthcare system, how you access it and how you are reimbursed - Useful if you are new to the French healthcare system or want a more in-depth understanding - Reader question and answer section Aimed at non-French nationals living here, the guide gives an overview of what you are (and are not) covered for. There is also information for second-home owners and regular visitors.
Get news, views and information from France
You have 2 free subscriber articles left
Subscribe now to read unlimited articles and exclusive content
Already a subscriber? Log in now